Distinguishing Between Arguing & Discussing

Although Arguing and Discussing may appear similar in nature, there is a distinct difference between the two. Arguing involves statement and counterstatement, while discussing involves deliberation on a specific point or topic. The primary difference between arguing and discussing is that discussing a matter can lead to a conclusion, whereas in the case of arguing, a proper conclusion cannot be reached. In this article, we will examine the differences between arguing and discussing.

What is Arguing?

Arguing involves statement and counterstatement and does not favorably end in a conclusion. Arguing is characterized by anger and displeasure, with a prima facie raising objections that pave the way for arguments. Arguing over an issue prolongs the issue without finding a permanent solution. Arguing often results in a verbal fight and can cultivate enmity between the individuals involved. Arguing is an act that is strictly avoided in certain international games and sports, such as cricket and football, where players seen arguing with umpires over a decision are punished according to the stern rules of the game. This is because the umpire’s decision should be respected and cannot be questioned. Now, let’s move on to discussing.

What is Discussing?

Discussing involves deliberation on a particular point or topic, with the potential to result in a conclusion. A discussion is the seat of intellect and development, unlike arguing, which has no place for prima facie. A healthy deliberation is the hallmark of any discussion. Discussing an issue aims to find a permanent solution, and discussing over an issue results in a strengthened relationship among those participating in the discussion. This is because both parties are focused on finding a solution to the problem rather than engaging in a verbal conflict. Thus, it is important to note that arguing can be punishable in some disciplines, while discussing is an act that is not punishable by any means. Now let’s summarize the difference as follows.

Key Takeaways

  • Arguing is characterized by anger and displeasure, whereas discussing is the seat of intellect and development.
  • Arguing over a particular topic does not favorably end in a conclusion, while discussing a particular topic can result in a conclusion.
  • Arguing is often characterized by the presence of a prima facie that raises objections, while discussing has no place for prima facie.
Gil Tillard
Gil Tillard
Gil Tillard is an accomplished writer with expertise in creating engaging articles and content across various platforms. His dedication to research and crafting high-quality content has led to over 5 years of professional writing and editing experience. In his personal life, Gil enjoys connecting with people from diverse backgrounds and cultures. His curiosity and eagerness to learn from others fuel his passion for communication. He believes that engaging with strangers can be both enlightening and enjoyable, making it easier to strike up conversations and expand one's horizons.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles