Conceptual vs Empirical
Empirical and conceptual are two methods commonly used when conducting research. The conceptual approach is also known as analytical, while the empirical approach involves testing a hypothesis through observation and experimentation. Both methods are well-regarded, and there are no strict rules about their application; they are not mutually exclusive and can be used in different aspects of a single research project.
In empirical research, data is gathered through observation and experimentation. If two scientists independently investigate a hypothesis and collect information through these methods, they may arrive at slightly different results. This is because the observational aspect of empirical research can differ between individuals, as each person may have a unique perspective when conducting their observations.
Conceptual analysis is the preferred method of analysis in social sciences and philosophy. In this approach, a researcher breaks down a theorem or concept into its constituent parts to better understand the deeper philosophical issue related to the theorem. Although this method has become popular, it has also faced criticism. However, most people agree that conceptual analysis is a useful method, but it should be used alongside other methods of analysis to produce clearer, more comprehensive results.
Key Takeaways:
– Empirical and conceptual are two distinct research approaches.
– Empirical research relies on observation and experimentation, producing verifiable results and is mainly used in scientific studies.
– Conceptual analysis is a popular research method in social sciences, philosophy, and psychology, involving the breakdown of theorems or concepts into their constituent parts.
